Agentcraft®

Employee experience · Preview

Cybersecurity SpecialistTests your defenses. Brings security into every change.

Runs authorized security and penetration tests. Simulates attacks and reviews incoming code. Prioritizes risks and verifies fixes.

Cybersecurity Specialist
Agentcraft®Cybersecurity Specialist

Security throughout the work

Knows your boundaries. Remembers past weaknesses.

Brings security requirements, past findings and verified fixes into the next review. You manage the test scope and what it remembers.

Define your systems and test boundaries

Share your architecture, security requirements and authorized test environments. It remembers past findings and checks whether the same weaknesses return.

LEARNS FROM YOUR WORK
My Security SpecialistLearns from working with you

“We require a tenant-isolation check for every new data endpoint. Shall I keep that as a review criterion for future changes?”

Example conversation. Your choice is only used in this preview.

A conversation is enough

Ready-to-use task examples

Ask about your risks, access or the latest test results. Your security specialist answers with evidence, impact and a clear next step.

What is our biggest security risk?

You

Review the current security findings. What should we fix first, and what evidence supports that priority?

My Security Specialist

The highest priority is a verified tenant-isolation gap. A dependency alert also needs review, but its runtime impact is not confirmed yet.

Risk priorities · Evidence and impact

  • First · A scoped test showed an ownership check missing between two synthetic tenants.
  • Next · Check whether the flagged library version is used on an exposed execution path.
  • Recommendation · Fix the verified boundary issue and retest both permitted and denied access.

What did the latest penetration test find?

You

Summarize the latest authorized penetration test. What was tested, what failed and what remains outside the report?

My Security Specialist

The report covers the staging API and two test tenants. It contains one verified access-control finding and two configuration observations.

Penetration test · Scope and findings

  • Scope · Authentication, tenant boundaries and agreed API routes in the approved test window.
  • Finding · Ownership verification failed for one test route; evidence and remediation criteria are recorded.
  • Limits · Production, third-party services and untested routes are not covered; this is not a blanket security clearance.

Review the change for security

Software Engineer

My pull request is ready. Review it for security risks and report merge-blocking findings and required verification before release.

My Security Specialist

The change adds a session token to request logs. That should be removed before merge; the review also needs a check that sensitive fields stay out of logs.

Security review · Merge readiness

  • Finding · Session credentials would be recorded by the new logging code.
  • Fix · Exclude the sensitive fields and retain only the diagnostic data needed for troubleshooting.
  • Verification · Add a regression check using synthetic credentials; assess exposure separately if this code has already run.

Who has more access than they need?

You

Review the current service and repository permissions. Which are broader than needed, and what would you change?

My Security Specialist

One service account has permissions beyond its documented job. I prepared a narrower proposal; no access settings were changed.

Access review · Proposed changes

  • Observed · The reporting service can write to storage even though its documented flow only reads.
  • Proposal · Limit the account to the required resources and actions after checking actual usage.
  • Verification · Test the report flow and denied operations before applying the permission change.

Review the design’s security boundaries

Software Architect

I prepared the file-sharing architecture. Before implementation, review trust boundaries, realistic threats and missing controls.

My Security Specialist

The main boundaries are user-to-API, API-to-storage and tenant-to-tenant. I mapped the controls that need evidence before release.

Threat model · File sharing

  • Access · Each request must verify ownership and the caller’s permitted action.
  • Sharing · Review link expiry, revocation and the information exposed by public responses.
  • Evidence · Test cross-tenant denial, revoked access and expired links using synthetic records.

Verify security finding closure

Auditor

The audit records mark these security findings as resolved. Verify the technical fixes and evidence; distinguish verified closure from status-only updates.

My Security Specialist

Two findings have retest evidence; one is awaiting verification. I have kept the unverified item open in the report.

Remediation · Verification status

  • Verified · The logging change no longer records synthetic session credentials.
  • Verified · Dependency update applied and the relevant security check rerun against that version.
  • Pending · The tenant-boundary fix is merged, but the authorized retest has not run yet.

Fictional conversations and sample results. This preview does not start tasks or connect your accounts.

Code, infrastructure and test evidence

Can use many tools for you

Connects code changes, dependency findings, cloud permissions and authorized test results to assess the security of your product.

  • GitHubCode & reviews
  • GitLabChanges & pipelines
  • SnykVulnerability findings
  • AWSRelease context
  • JiraTasks & acceptance criteria

You define the authorized systems, test scope and operating limits. Active tests run within that scope; connections shown are previews.

A conversation it starts

Proactive. Tests your defenses.

Runs scheduled security checks, attack simulations and penetration tests within the authorized scope. Joins code reviews to catch security violations before changes reach production.

Runs recurring security checks

Checks dependencies, access boundaries and configuration in the agreed environments, and records changes since the previous run.

Simulates attacks against your defenses

Exercises agreed attack scenarios with test accounts in the authorized environment, then checks whether controls and alerts responded.

Performs scoped penetration tests

Tests agreed application and API boundaries in the approved window, documents findings and retests fixes.

Joins code reviews before merge

Reviews incoming changes for authorization gaps, exposed secrets, unsafe data handling and security-rule violations.

You choose the topics, how often it reaches out and when you’d rather stay quiet.

MOBILE APP · EXAMPLE MESSAGES
14:32
A message from your security specialist.
My Security Specialistexample

A new dependency finding needs review

The scheduled check found a reported vulnerability in a library used by the API. I identified the affected version and prepared an impact review for Engineer.

My Security Specialistexample

The control worked; the alert did not

In the staging exercise, repeated unauthorized access was denied, but the expected alert did not appear. I recorded the evidence and shared the monitoring gap with SRE.

My Security Specialistexample

A tenant boundary failed verification

The scoped test found a missing ownership check using two synthetic tenant accounts. I documented the finding, notified the CEO and prepared the fix criteria for Engineer.

My Security Specialistexample

A code change needs a security fix

The proposed logging change includes a session token. I added a review finding and requested removal plus a regression check before merge.

Separate examples of the planned experience, shown together. This preview does not send messages or notifications.

Your proposed roster

Security expertise in Enterprise

Bring security testing, architecture and service reliability into one roster with Enterprise.

Proposed packages · Preview only. Extra usage is billed separately; the rate is not yet defined. Exploring a package does not start checkout or change a subscription.

Keep exploring

Agentcraft®

Make security part of how you build.

Explore packages